(2017) 4 Visn. Nac. akad. prokur. Ukr. 64–70
doi
Title of the article	Processual and Tactical Features of the Expert Request in Judicial Review of Criminal Proceedings
Author(s)	HANNA HANOVA PhD in Law, Docent, senior lecturer, department of initial and continuing professional training of military prosecutors, National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine, ganova@ukr.net OLEKSANDR IZOTOV PhD in Law, Docent, lecturer, department of initial and continuing professional training of military prosecutors, National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine, alex.izprok@gmail.com
Short title of the journal (ISSN)	Visn. Nac. akad. prokur. Ukr.
Year	2017
Issue	4
Pages	[64–70]
Language	Ukrainian
Abstract	The article reveals the problematic issues of assessing the expert’s conclusion in criminal proceedings, procedural and forensic aspects of his interrogation in court. The authors note the need to specify the subject of questioning the expert and suggest recommendations for his conduct in the court session.
Keywords	trial interrogation; expert; source of evidence; expert decision; court proceedings; criminal proceedings.
References	REFERENCES 1. Panko N.A. Dopyt eksperta v sudi yak zasib otsinky yoho vysnovku [The Questioning the Expert in Court as a Means of Evaluating his Conclusion]. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava. 2013. № 1. P. 280–284 (in Ukrainian). 2. Tytov A.M., Tiutiunnyk T.V. Deiaki aspekty dopytu eksperta u kryminalnomu protsesi [Some Aspects of Expert Examination in Criminal Proceedings]. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional’nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Serija “Juridicheskie nauki”. 2013. T. 26(65). № 2/1. P. 363–368 (in Ukrainian). 3. Maksymyshyn N.M. Sudovyi dopyt: protsesualne i kryminalistychne doslidzhennia [The Forensic Examination: Procedural and Forensic Research] (dys. kand. yuryd. nauk; Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Ivana Franka). Lviv, 2016. 250 p. (in Ukrainian). 4. Maksymyshyn N.M. Shchodo predmeta dopytu eksperta u sudi [The Concerning the Question of Expert Examination in Court]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho universytetu. 2014. Iss. 2. T. 4. P. 118–121 (in Ukrainian). 5. Pylypenko H.M. Otsinka kompetentnosti eksperta [The Assessment of Expert Competence]. Pravnychyi chasopys Donetskoho universytetu. 2013. № 2. P. 159–164 (in Ukrainian). 6. Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro ekspertno-kvalifikatsiini komisii ta atestatsiiu sudovykh ekspertiv [On the Approval of the Regulation on Expertise and Qualification Commissions and the Certification of Forensic Experts]: nakaz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy [order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine] vid 3 bereznia 2015 roku № 301/5. URL: (in Ukrainian). 7. Rubis A. Osnovy taktiki doprosa jeksperta [The Fundamentals of Expert Interrogation Tactics]. Zakonnost’ i pravoporjadok. 2016. № 2(38). P. 54–59 (in Russian).